DSpace Repository

Nation building is dilemma in srilanka after war

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jayasena, C.
dc.contributor.author Chandrasekera, S.
dc.contributor.author Samarakoon, W.M.S.A.
dc.contributor.author Pradeep, H.U.S.
dc.contributor.author Thambiraja, V.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-07-15T08:40:19Z
dc.date.accessioned 2022-07-07T07:14:10Z
dc.date.available 2021-07-15T08:40:19Z
dc.date.available 2022-07-07T07:14:10Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.issn 2279-1922
dc.identifier.uri http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/3612
dc.description.abstract Nationalist movement in Sri Lanka was organized for liberating the local religious, languages and culture from British influences. Initially, Sinhala, Tamil and Muslims leaders worked together for re-waking the local cultures. The ethnic harmony was collapsed in post independent period, due to the decisions of local elite who were in power. The legislative acts as citizenship defining, Sinhala only and education standardization created uneven opportunities for ethnic- minority groups as Tamil, and Muslims mainly. The research problem is that, why society emphasizes more on emotional historical values based on ethnicity; even states want to construct one nation, one country. The research questions are why do government policies not have strength on changing the attitude of pressure groups in society and follow the integration polices? And why people from different ethnic communities do interviews, focused not drive their attention on cooperation? The data is found from primary and secondary sources as interviews, focused group discussion and newspapers, ongoing research, published articles and books respectively. Priority is given for qualitative data. The qualitative data is given ideas clearly and few relevant statistics data are available. Phenomenology used as method for analysis the data. The key findings are Sri Lankan political system is based on majoritarian democracy. The parliamentarian democracy again makes the “clinetalistic politics” and it cause to increase the divisions among the ethnic groups. The massive infrastructure development projects are not be able to handle the root causes for war properly. In other words, the representative in decision making bodies concern least on integrating the ethnic communities in grass roots. The programs for sustainable peace in post war do not respond the real demands of the people. The liberal economic agenda and peace building fails due to these polices do not fix with the environment. In spite of infrastructure development, communities in armed conflicts and experienced it need nation building as a form for unified them. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Jaffna en_US
dc.subject Nation building en_US
dc.subject Post-war en_US
dc.subject Liberal peace agenda en_US
dc.subject Clientalistc politcs en_US
dc.title Nation building is dilemma in srilanka after war en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record