DSpace Repository

Preanalytical errors in a hematology laboratory of a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka: A Six Sigma analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Siriwardhana, V. G. S. M.
dc.contributor.author Wickramasinghe, W. A. C. H.
dc.contributor.author Herath, R. A. M. S. M.
dc.contributor.author Jayaratne, K. A. D. S.
dc.contributor.author Rasaratnam, K.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-12-02T04:02:02Z
dc.date.available 2024-12-02T04:02:02Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.identifier.uri http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/10890
dc.description.abstract Precision and accuracy of laboratory results are vital for clinical diagnostics, but preanalytical errors can impact the test reliability, patient safety, and treatment efficacy. Six Sigma was reported as one of the best quality indicators for evaluating laboratory errors and performance; however, its applicability in the preanalytical phase of hematological laboratories in Sri Lanka is limited. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the preanalytical errors of a hematology laboratory in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka using Six Sigma analysis. A retrospective observation study was conducted from October 2023 to March 2024. Data regarding preanalytical errors was manually retrieved from the paper records maintained in a hematology laboratory of a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. The distribution of errors was determined using descriptive statistics and subjected to converting defects per million opportunities and Sigma values using the Sigma scale and Sigma calculator available at https://westgard.com, respectively. During the study period, 411 preanalytical errors were detected with an error rate of 0.9% from 45,490 test samples. Out of nine preanalytical errors detected, the majority of errors were due to clotted samples (62.5%). The next most common errors noted were insufficient samples (8.3%) followed by inappropriate containers (6.1%), mismatched samples (5.85%), incomplete request forms (5.4%), and absence of request forms (5.1%). Furthermore, 6.8% of the errors were attributed to hemolyzed samples, delayed samples, and wrong anticoagulant-to-blood ratio. Six Sigma analysis indicated that the overall Sigma values were above 4 among which the lowest sigma of 4.1 was observed for clotted samples followed by 4.7 for insufficient samples. The highest sigma value of 5.1 was observed for hemolyzed, delayed, and wrong anticoagulantto-blood ratio samples. Results indicated that Six Sigma is a valuable tool for evaluating preanalytical errors in hematology laboratories. Implementing Six Sigma analysis for preanalytical error determination in hematology laboratories in Sri Lanka is recommended. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Jaffna en_US
dc.subject Pre-analytical errors en_US
dc.subject Hematology laboratory en_US
dc.subject Six Sigma en_US
dc.subject Sri Lanka en_US
dc.title Preanalytical errors in a hematology laboratory of a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka: A Six Sigma analysis en_US
dc.type Conference paper en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record