Abstract:
Purpose: The knowledge-based view (KBV) of social entrepreneurship is a powerful 
mechanism to transform knowledge into innovations. This viewpoint of social 
enterprises differs from that of commercial enterprises, as typical businesses have only 
one bottom line such as profit, but social enterprises have three, namely: people, planet 
and profit. Thus, the overarching objective of this study is to recognize the knowledge based view in social enterprises.
Methodology: The study followed a qualitative research paradigm and semi-structured 
interviews were conducted with 24 local social entrepreneurs who belong to several 
sectors, including service and manufacturing, across the country. Consequently, the key 
respondents of the study were the owner-managers or senior managers of the social 
enterprises in Sri Lanka. Further, to derive the sample, the study used the maximum 
variation sampling technique as it assists in determining the maximum variation of 
social enterprises in the sector. Finally, the data was analyzed thematically as it could 
provide reliable and insightful results.
Findings: The study explored three (03) themes to recognize the knowledge-based 
view in social enterprises, namely: a) sources of knowledge gathering, b) knowledge 
dissemination, and c) knowledge integration. First, the study identified three most 
mentioned sources of knowledge gathering in social enterprises: i) social associations, 
ii) research, and iii) intuition. Second, this study identifies that social enterprises 
disseminate knowledge primarily through informal networks. Third, it revealed that 
social enterprises integrate their knowledge in terms of i) directives and ii) routines. 
Thus, the study explored significant differences in how social enterprises gather new 
knowledge, disseminate the knowledge within their organizations, and combine this 
new knowledge when coming up with novel initiatives.
Research limitations: A limited number of social entrepreneurs were interviewed in 
the study. However, the sample and sampling technique were reliable enough to cover a 
wide range of variation within the social enterprise sector.
Implications: Subsequently, the study provides valuable implications for theory, practitioners, and policymakers. First, this paper mainly contributes to the strategic 
management literature through the interpretation and application of a knowledge based view in a Sri Lankan social enterprise research context. It also adds to the field's 
ongoing discussion of developing context-specific theories for SE. Second, it provides 
implications for practitioners. Herein, knowledge exchange has been highlighted as one 
of the essentials toward the economic and social goals within social enterprises. Thus, 
our Findings proposed several sources that social enterprises should use to build 
established social enterprises. Third, the study has implications for policymakers by 
providing insights into how knowledge exchange lifts inventiveness and allows social 
enterprises to more quickly respond to environmental necessities or demands. Overall, 
this study contributes to the academic field of SE by emphasizing the significance of 
rethinking the KBV of social entrepreneurship from the perspective of developing 
countries.