| dc.description.abstract |
By and large ‘anthropocentricism’ has been controlled everything and developed
an episteme and given secondary status to other beings ‘Emancipation of only human
being’ taken for granted and “emancipation of all the beings” never considered as a fact.
This narrow episteme brought chaos due to the imbalance in natural eco system after a
point in history. The time has come to rethink about life related to all being community.
The research problem is what would be an authentic ethics for the emancipation of all
beingsincludinghumanity? Howdopeoplechallengethedominationofanthropocentricism?
This research study is a qualitative case study of activists and ordinary people in Sri
Lanka who apply critical consciousness in their activities and life. In this qualitative
case study research, there were interviews, Critical analysis in Praxis approach.
Prevailing ‘Christology and ethics under the domination of Anthropocentricism’ is not
relevant to the emancipation of ALL BEINGS including humanity. Colonization was the
tragedy which made Asian humans to separate themselves from other living beings and
the ‘nonliving beings’ from all rest of the creation.
What I propose, is more inclusive praxis-based networks go beyond
“anthropocentricism” to all living being which certainly include humanity. Affirmation
of life should be a basic component in ethics. Individualism, anthropocentricism,
patriarchy, racism, casteism and so on have been a problem which destroy not only
human but also all beings. Democracy, morality and so on never get importance in
neoliberal episteme. The multiple neo liberal mechanisms we have is ‘individualism,
consumerism... and so on’ which are based on evil structures which use to take number
of avatars today? An appropriate example from Sri Lanka is “online safety bill” which
assault right of expression and restrict rights of freedom. By and large the tendency of
Liberation Ethics has been maintained as “liberation’, beyond any doubt, but most of
the thinking was fully anthropocentric and exclusively Christianity oriented. Though the
cosmic thinking was there at the end it was only for the sake of human liberation.
An alternate perspective, what I propose is the preferential option for the “All
Beings Community”. Through this I demand a paradigm shift from the ‘anthropocentric’
to the ‘cosmocentric’ and the ‘individualistic’ to the ‘community’. It is appropriate to
mention that ‘the preferential option for the “Other”’ in the perspective of Enrique
Dussel’s and Emmanuel Levinas’s “Others” based ethics, the first philosophy have been
a paradigm shift which affirm emancipation of vulnerable human. But I want to propose
that there is a need to ‘opt for a preferential option for the “Other Being”’ which also
includinghumanity, todevelopanauthenticemancipationforallbeyondanthropocentricism
(Eco Ethical Emancipation). An Eco-Ethical-Emancipation (EEE)’ is something very
appropriate. When all realized that nature, plants, animals, birds… are our relatives
there will be harmony and that will create a natural resistance against evil. |
en_US |