dc.description.abstract |
The localization of English language education has emerged as a
significant pedagogical approach aimed at making language learning more
culturally relevant and engaging for students. However, English as a Second
Language (ESL) teachers often encounter tensions between integrating
local cultural elements and the demands of standardized English curricula.
This study investigates the perspectives of experienced ESL teachers (with 5
to15 years of teaching experience) on the localization of English education,
the instructional strategies they employ, and the challenges they face in
implementing such practices. Framed within Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory
and Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), the research explores how
teachers mediate language learning through culturally responsive pedagogy
and interactive classroom practices. Employing a qualitative narrative inquiry
approach, data were collected from eight ESL teachers through semi- structured
interviews. Participants were drawn from various educational institutions to
ensure diversity in context and perspective. Thematic analysis was used to
identify recurring patterns in teachers’ beliefs, teaching strategies, and the
institutional limitations they navigate. Findings indicate that teachers perceive
localization as a means to enhance student engagement and comprehension
through the use of culturally relevant content, code-switching and real-world
applications. However, their efforts are often constrained by curricular rigidity,
the pressure of standardized testing, and institutional resistance. Teachers
also expressed a need to balance linguistic authenticity with the imperative
of preparing students for global communication. Despite these constraints,
contextualized instruction was seen to enable student confidence and
support more meaningful language acquisition. This study contributes to the
broader discourse on decolonizing English education by centering the voices
of practitioners engaged in pedagogical adaptation. The findings highlight
the necessity of policy reform, teacher training and curriculum flexibility to
support localized English instruction without compromising global standards.
Future research could further explore student perspectives and the long-term
impacts of localized learning on language proficiency. |
en_US |