Abstract:
The interplay of several severe internal and external shocks has posed substantial challenges to
the stability of the Sri Lankan economy. Therefore, this study investigates the presence of
structural breaks in the relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in Sri
Lanka, using annual data from 1990 to 2023. In addition to energy consumption and economic
growth, gross fixed capital formation and labour force participation are incorporated as key
explanatory variables. The Chow test is applied to identify structural breaks, and the VAR Granger
causality test is used to examine the direction of causality between the variables. Also, the ARDL
bound test is used to identify the cointegration relationship between energy consumption and
economic growth, incorporating structural breaks. The Chow test results indicate the presence of
structural breaks in 2004, 2008, 2020, and 2022 periods. These breakpoints align with major
economic and environmental shocks, including the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, the 2008 global
financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the recent economic crisis in Sri Lanka. The results
of the Zivod-Andrews test indicate that economic growth, energy consumption, and labour force
participation are stationary variables in first difference I(1). On the other hand, Gross fixed capital
formation is found to be stationary at level I(0). The VAR Granger causality test shows no shortterm
causal relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in the absence of
structural breaks. However, a short-run unidirectional causal relationship exists when
considering structural breaks. The empirical findings show that the variables in the study are
cointegrated, indicating the existence of a long-run relationship among them. The ARDL bounds
test shows a positive long-run impact of energy consumption on economic growth; this
relationship does not hold in the short run. Notably, when structural breaks are considered,
energy consumption negatively impacts economic growth in the short run, while its long-term
impact becomes statistically insignificant. These findings suggest that external and internal
shocks have disrupted the energy growth nexus in Sri Lanka. This study offers new insights for
policymakers to account for structural breaks in policy formulation to address the short-run
adverse impact of energy consumption on economic growth.