DSpace Repository

A Comparison of Single-Stage and Two-Stage Modelling Approaches for Automatic Forensic Speaker Recognition

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Thiruvaran, T.
dc.contributor.author Ambikairajah, E.
dc.contributor.author Epps, J.
dc.contributor.author Enzinger, E.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-03-19T04:57:53Z
dc.date.accessioned 2022-06-27T10:02:33Z
dc.date.available 2021-03-19T04:57:53Z
dc.date.available 2022-06-27T10:02:33Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.citation Thiruvaran, T., Ambikairajah, E., Epps, J., & Enzinger, E. (2013, December). A comparison of single-stage and two-stage modelling approaches for automatic forensic speaker recognition. In 2013 IEEE 8th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (pp. 433-438). IEEE. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/2101
dc.description.abstract In automatic forensic speaker recognition research two frameworks, namely single-stage and two-stage modelling, are used. Although both have their own strengths and limitations, performance is an important attribute that needs to be considered when selecting these methods for forensic research. This paper compares a calibrated single-stage system with a calibrated two-stage system using a common database in terms of different performance metrics. Neither of the systems provides a consistent advantage over the other in terms of all performance measures, raising the question of whether the use of a two-stage system, which requires additional data and effort, is warranted. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher IEEE en_US
dc.title A Comparison of Single-Stage and Two-Stage Modelling Approaches for Automatic Forensic Speaker Recognition en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record