Abstract:
Optimizing compaction energy reduces uncertainty in mass production of pervious concrete, but depends on
aggregate-shape. This study analyses impact of aggregate size and shape on porosity and compressive strength.
Aggregate-to-cement-ratio (AC) (3–5), compaction (Comp) (0–60 blows), aggregate-size (5–25 mm) and
aggregate-shape (0, 200 and 1000 revolutions in Los Angeles Abrasion Value) were used to cast 486 samples.
Porosity was computed from constituent-ratios (T.Poro) and apparent-weight (M.Poro) and Compressivestrength
(Com.S) using Universal Testing Machine. M.Poro and T.Poro had significantly different impact from
size and shape of aggregates. Feature selection models, Minimum-Redundancy-Maimum-Relevance (MRMR) and
Kruskal-Wallis had significantly different ranking of features, owing to the different concepts. MRMR indicated
dominance of M.Poro while a tenth of which was observed for Com.S and less than a twentieth for T.Poro. MRMR
indicated significant impact of aggregate size (second highest score, half of M.Poro), indicating the impact
aggregate shape had on performance was not uniform across different size of aggregates. Three performance
parameters (M.Poro, T.Poro and Com.S) classified observations for aggregate shape (degree of milling) with an
accuracy of 92.2% and 93% on Support-Vector-Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest-Neighbours (KNN) algorithms.
Inclusion of aggregate size as feature improved accuracy to more than 96% while further inclusion of AC Comp
improved the accuracy further to 99.6%. Classification of aggregate size was less accurate (70–80% with performance
parameters alone and 92–93% with three design parameters included), indicating less impact on
pervious concrete performance compared to shape of aggregates.
