DSpace Repository

Out-of-pocket spending on public and private antenatal care among women delivering at a tertiary care centre in northern Sri Lanka

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kumar, R.
dc.contributor.author Rahavi, R.
dc.contributor.author Narmatha, T.
dc.contributor.author Shawya, G.
dc.contributor.author Muhunthan, K.
dc.contributor.author Coonghe, P.A.D.
dc.contributor.author Shivashankar, T.
dc.contributor.author Shivaganesh, S.
dc.contributor.author Pathmeswaran, A.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-02-19T06:39:46Z
dc.date.available 2025-02-19T06:39:46Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.identifier.uri http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/11125
dc.description.abstract Background and objective: Pregnant women who access public healthcare also use private ANC. This study describes out-of-pocket expenses (OOPE) on public and private antenatal care and associated factors among pregnant women delivering at Teaching Hospital Jaffna (THJ). Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at THJ. Pregnant women ≥18 years awaiting delivery after completing 33 weeks of gestation were consecutively recruited. An interviewer-administered questionnaire elicited data on sociodemographic details and OOPE. Data were collected over 12 weeks (20/06/2022 to 09/09/2022). Interviews were held at the bedside and medical records reviewed. Data were analysed with SPSS (v21). Total OOPE data were log-transformed and multiple linear regression was used to analyse predictors (critical level 0.05). Results: In total, 251 pregnant women participated (response rate 97.6%). In the sample, 199 (79.3%) women were unemployed homemakers and 209 (83.2%) reported a monthly household income of ≤Rs. 50,000. Antenatal risk factors were documented in the H-512 in 183 (72.9%) participants. The majority reported using private ANC (80.5%, n=202), mostly private pharmacies (60.6%), specialist consultations (48.2%), and private diagnostic services (45%). Mean total OOPE on ANC was Rs.17,304 (SD 25,169) with a median of Rs. 6,049 (IQR 1,984-26,315). Among those who reported using the relevant service component, highest spending was on ultrasound scanning [mean Rs. 8,698 (SD 5,693); median Rs. 8,250 (IQR 3,850-11,900)], specialist consultations [mean Rs. 7364 (SD 4,586); median Rs. 7,800 (IQR 2,650-11,450)] and pharmaceuticals [mean Rs. 6,678 (SD 17,528); median Rs. 1,400 (IQR 300-6,000)]. Monthly household income, number of antenatal risk factors, and visiting channeling centres were identified as significant predictors of OOPE (R2=0.63; F=113.64, df=3, p<0.001). Conclusions: Pregnant women who rely on the public sector in Jaffna report substantial levels of OOPE, with over half the sample having spent over Rs. 6000 on ANC in the post-COVID setting. Wealthier women, those with several antenatal risk factors, and those who accessed private specialist care were more likely to spend out-of-pocket on ANC. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Jaffna Medical Association en_US
dc.subject Antenatal care en_US
dc.subject Access to healthcare en_US
dc.subject Out-of-pocket expenditures en_US
dc.subject Maternal health en_US
dc.subject Jaffna en_US
dc.title Out-of-pocket spending on public and private antenatal care among women delivering at a tertiary care centre in northern Sri Lanka en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record