Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/2365
Title: Controlling Discoloration and Quality Evaluation of Dehydrated Annona muricata (soursop) Powder
Authors: Hettige, K.D.T.
Jayarathna, G.E.D.A.M.
Jayawardana, P.A.M.
Keywords: Dehydration;Enzymatic browning;Blanching;Soursop
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: University of Jaffna
Abstract: This study was conducted to control the discoloration and evaluate the quality of dehydrated soursop powder. Soursop is a highly nutritious, underutilized and, seasonal fruit crop grown in Sri Lanka. The dehydrated powder form of soursop is one of the ideal preservation modes since its shelf stability and versatility in the usage of many values added product. The discoloration of soursop (enzymatic browning) during the processing can be identified as the major drawback, which affects the final product quality. Ten different treatments [0.5% ascorbic acid, 0.5% citric acid, 0.25% ascorbic acid with 0.25% citric acid, 0.1% sodium metabisulfite (SMS), and control] along with blanching and without blanching were used to controlling the discoloration. The soursop samples were subjected to different pretreatments was dehydrated using convectional air drying technique (55 °C for 16 hours) and finely ground to obtain the powder form. After the drying, only four treatments, out of ten, were selected owing to the minimum discoloration based on their browning indexes (BI). The best treatment and rehydration ability of soursop powder were selected via sensory evaluation conducted using a semi-trained panel. Moreover, the colour, pH, titratable acidity (TA) of all treatments were tested throughout 12 weeks storage period under the ambient condition. Subsequently, microbial count and proximate composition were determined for the best treatment. Experiments were conducted as completely randomized design with triplicates and data were analyzed using ANOVA. According to the results, “0.1% SMS without blanching” treatment gave the significantly highest (p<0.05) overall sensory acceptability in both dehydrated powder and its rehydrated juice. BI, pH and TA of the best treatment was recorded as 12.79 ± 0.27, 5.40 ± 0.01, and 1.97 ± 0.05% respectively. Moisture, crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, ash and carbohydrate of the evaluated soursop dehydrated powder sample were 11.90 ± 0.13%, 13.98 ± 0.17%, 6.08 ± 0.15%, 13.03 ± 0.12%, 5.91 ± 0.24% and 49.10 ± 0.32%, respectively. Total plate count and yeast and mold count were varied from 2.5x 102 CFU/mL to 7.3x103 CFU/mL and 3.5x101 CFU/mL to 9.8x102 CFU/mL during the storage period, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that “0.1% SMS without blanching” was the best pretreatment to control the enzymatic browning of soursop dehydrated powder with a shelf life of twelve weeks at ambient conditions.
URI: http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/2365
ISSN: 2465-6143
Appears in Collections:ICDA 2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Controlling Discoloration and Quality Evaluation of Dehydrated.pdf644.99 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.