Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/10251
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIllippangama, I.P.A.U.N.K.-
dc.contributor.authorAwanthika, H.K.T.-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, S.A.-
dc.contributor.authorTharangani, R.M.H.-
dc.contributor.authorJayasena, D. D.-
dc.contributor.authorMacelline, W.H.D.S.P.-
dc.contributor.authorKasagala, K.H.D.T.-
dc.contributor.authorPalliyeguru, M.W.C.D.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-21T04:22:19Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-21T04:22:19Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/10251-
dc.description.abstractAntibiotics have been banned in European poultry industry due to public health haz- ards caused by antibiotic residues and microbial resistance. Necrotic enteritis caused by Clostridium perfringence results in an economic damage. Therefore, alternatives should be identified to withdraw antibiotics from animal feeds. This study was conducted to determine the effects of probiotics on growth performance, meat quality and necrotic enteritis exposure in broiler chickens. Experimental diets were based on maize and soy- bean meal. Five dietary treatments were prepared as feed without growth promoters (Negative control; T1); Bacillus licheniformis isolated from healthy poultry (T2); com- mercial probiotic containing Bacillus species (T3); a combination of B. licheniformis, commercial probiotic, Lactobacillus spp. and Saccharomyces spp. (T4) and with antibi- otic, Zinc Bacitracin (positive control; T5). The inclusion rate of growth promoters was 0.1 g/kg of basal diet. In T4 all four probiotics were included at equal level (0.025/0.1 g of the combination). A total of 420 day-old broiler chicks (Cobb 500) were randomly assigned to experimental pens. Each treatment replicated 6 times with 14 birds in a pen. Results revealed that birds fed growth promoters had higher (P <0.05) weight gain than those fed no growth promoters. Birds fed antibiotic and commercial probiotic had sim- ilar growth (2 kg) and feed conversion ratio (1.5) compared to negative control, 1.8 kg and 1.6 respectively. Antibody levels against alpha toxin were higher (P <0.05) in birds fed no growth promoters compared to those fed growth promoters, indicating an aggra- vated C. perfringence infection. A better juiciness, mouth feel and overall acceptance were identified in breast meat of broilers fed T4 compared to those from other birds. In conclusion, Bacillus species incorporated probiotics can be used as alternatives to an- tibiotic growth promoters, to gain similar growth performances and better quality breast meat.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUva Wellassa University, Sri Lanka.en_US
dc.subjectAntibioticen_US
dc.subjectBacillus speciesen_US
dc.subjectGrowth performanceen_US
dc.subjectMeat quality traitsen_US
dc.subjectNecrotic enteritisen_US
dc.titleComparison of Growth Performances, Meat Quality Traits and Necrotic Enteritis Exposure in Broiler Chickens Fed Probiotics Compared to Antibiotic as Growth Promotersen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US
Appears in Collections:Animal Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparison of Growth Performances, Meat Quality.pdf704.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.