Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/2340
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKumari, D.
dc.contributor.authorMohanaramanan, T.
dc.contributor.authorAtapattu, H.
dc.contributor.authorDe Silva, S.
dc.contributor.authorRavirajan, P.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-11T15:58:11Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-07T05:02:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-11T15:58:11Z
dc.date.available2022-07-07T05:02:45Z-
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0925-3467
dc.identifier.urihttp://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/2340-
dc.description.abstractCdS/CdTe thin film solar cells have become matured photovoltaic technology, next to silicon solar cells technology due to ideal band gap, low manufacturing cost, and scalability of CdTe deposition. Although CdS/CdTe solar cells with copper based back contact have shown the best efficiencies by reducing roll-over effect and enhancing the electrical properties of CdTe, it is well known that their performance reduces with time, mainly due to diffusion of Cu through the CdTe absorber. This study focuses on finding a suitable alternative back contact namely, spiro/Au, MoO3 / Ag, CuI / Au and Poly(ethylenedioxythiophene): polystyrene sulphonate(PEDOT:PSS) /Au in which Au and Ag contacts were deposited through thermal evaporation under high vacuum together with MoO3 as a hole transporter while spiro, CuI and PEDOT:PSS hole transporters were deposited using spin coating technique. Performance of the device with PEDOT:PSS/Au exhibited the highest short-circuit current density over 24 mAcm-2 together with an open circuit voltage of 0.39V and a fill factor of 0.32 which resulted an efficiency of 3.04% at solar simulator intensity of 100 mW/cm2 among the studied material combinations. However, fill factor of this device was poor in comparison with device with Cu/Au contact, probably due to poor compatibility between inorganic and organic interface. These solar cell structures were subjected to stability checking for a period up to 8 months from their fabrication. Device with Cu/Au lost about 5 % of its initial efficiency while efficiency of device with PEDOT:PSS/Au remained the same over the period of 8 months.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Jaffnaen_US
dc.subjectBack contacten_US
dc.subjectthermal evaporationen_US
dc.subjecthole transporteren_US
dc.subjectthin film solar cellen_US
dc.titleAlternative Back Contact Materials for CdS/CdTe Thin Film Solar Cellsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:AMCEHA 2019

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Alternative Back Contact Materials for CdSCdTe Thin Film Solar Cells.pdf589.64 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.