Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/13117Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Parkavi, R. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kalki, P. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kishajiny, I. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kajanitha, K. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ajantha, K. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-09-30T03:45:07Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-09-30T03:45:07Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1391-8796 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/13117 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Migraine is a unilateral headache accompanied by nausea, vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia. Propranolol and pizotifen are widely used in migraine prevention but their side effects (SE) often influence the therapeutic outcomes Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of propranolol and pizotifen and its side effects. Methodology: Descriptive cross-sectional study with 8 weeks of data collection. Data were collected at neurology clinic as an interviewer-administered validated questionnaire. Participants are identified with migraine and not previously prescribed with the preventive medication and patients were followed for 01 month. Likert scale,0-4 (0=No effect, 4= Severe), was used to collect data related to severity SEs score and total score for each patients’ SEs were calculated. Results: Of 270 migraine patients, 104 were selected and used both drugs. Prevalence of propranolol was 22% and 59 patients reported SEs (mean =2) which were palpitation (48%), postural hypotension (42%), dizziness (53%) and sleep disturbances (53%). And pizotifen prevalence was 17 %. 45 patients reported SE (mean=2.5) which were increase appetite (29%), dizziness (53%), drowsiness (27%), dry mouth (53%), nausea (56%), weight gain (7%) fatigue (29%) and prolonged sleep (13%). Pizotifen participants, dry mouth was significantly higher in male (p=0.025) and unemployed (p=0.038) and fatigue was higher in income below Rs.35,000.00 (p=0.026).Pizotifen had a significantly higher mean score (4.58) than propranolol (3.63), (p = 0.019). Conclusions: Pizotifen’s side-effects are more severe than propranolol. Clinical education on pizotifen side effects severity will improve awareness and adherence of the patients. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka | en_US |
| dc.subject | Migraine-patient | en_US |
| dc.subject | Pizotifen | en_US |
| dc.subject | Propranolol Prevalence | en_US |
| dc.subject | Side effects | en_US |
| dc.title | Prevalence of propranolol and pizotifen use and their side effects among migraine patients at Teaching Hospital, Jaffna | en_US |
| dc.type | Conference paper | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Pharmacy | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence of propranolol and pizotifen use and their side effects among migraine patients at Teaching Hospital, Jaffna.pdf | 248.92 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.