Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/11197
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaseevan, S.-
dc.contributor.authorNishanthi, W.A.A.G.N.-
dc.contributor.authorRajapakse, S.-
dc.contributor.authorMagana Arachchi, D.N.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-03T06:28:23Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-03T06:28:23Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/11197-
dc.description.abstractThe Lipocalin 2 (LCN2) gene has been identified as a tubular injury-related renal biomarker in chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the findings remain equivocal as its regulations could be influenced by clinicopathological factors associated with CKD. Therefore, this study aims to elucidate the association of clinicopathological factors on adopting the LCN2 gene expression as a diagnostic marker for CKD. The study cohort included 115 study participants, including healthy volunteers (HC) (n = 20) and CKD patients (n=95). Total RNA extraction was done from centrifuged urine pellet using the phenol-chloroform RNA extraction method. RNA was reverse transcribed and used for quantitative PCR reactions. The biochemical parameters, including serum creatinine, blood haemoglobin level, and serum potassium, were tested during the clinic visit. Socio-demographic and therapeutic data were obtained. The results showed that 67.4% of CKD patients had LCN2 gene expression, while the diabetic nephropathy (DN) study group (n = 25) showed a significant upregulation (Log2 fold-change = 3.28 ± 0.58; p = 0.009) compared to other CKD groups. Moreover, gender variation did not influence the LCN2 gene dysregulation in CKD (p = 0.213) and HC (p = 0.103). The LCN2 gene expression showed a consistent increase with the duration of CKD within the DN study groups (Log2 fold-change: <1 year = 1.42 ± 1.19; 1-5 years = 2.89 ± 0.91; >5 years = 4.79 ± 1.24). This trend did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.219). The erythropoietic activity was not influenced by Lcn2 dysregulation in CKD patients of both genders (Male: R2=0.004, p = 0.742; Female: R2 = 0.174, p = 0.019). The antidiabetic treatments and erythropoietin administration did not alter the LCN2 gene regulation in the CKD group compared to CKD patients without receiving the above therapeutic agents (p >0.05). From this study, LCN2 gene dysregulation is unaffected by gender, duration of CKD, anti-diabetic treatments, and erythropoietin administration. Therefore, LCN2 mRNA levels could serve as a more effective predictive biomarker for the diagnosis of DN.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherYoung Scientists’ Association, National Institute of Fundamental Studiesen_US
dc.subjectChronic kidney diseaseen_US
dc.subjectClinicopathological factorsen_US
dc.subjectGene expressionen_US
dc.subjectUrinary lipocalin 2en_US
dc.subjectDiabetic nephropathyen_US
dc.titleThe role of clinicopathological factors on the adoption of Lipocalin 2 (LCN2) gene as a renal biomarker for chronic kidney diseaseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Medical Laboratory Sciences



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.