Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/1053
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKetheeswaren, S.
dc.contributor.authorRosaline Mary, S.
dc.contributor.authorVisvanath, B.
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-14T09:10:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-29T06:55:40Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-14T09:10:46Z
dc.date.available2022-06-29T06:55:40Z-
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/ujrr/handle/123456789/1053-
dc.description.abstractThree Web search engines, namely, Alta Vista, Excite, and Lycos, were compared and evaluated in terms of their search capabilities (e.g., Boolean logic, truncation, field search, word and phrase search) and retrieval performances (i.e.. precision and response time) using sample queries drawn from themes of the conference: Re-Building the Libraries. Recall, the other evaluation criterion of information retrieval. is deliberately omitted from this study because it is impossible to assume how many relevant items there are for a particular query in the huge and ever changing Web system. We found that Alta Vista outperformed Excite and Lycos in both search facilities and retrieval performance although Lycos had the largest coverage of Web resources among the three Web search engines examined.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKumaraguru College of Technologyen_US
dc.subjectSearch Enginesen_US
dc.subjectPrecisionen_US
dc.subjectInformation Retrievalsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Web Search Engines: A Comparative Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Publication - Library

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
pdfresizer.com-pdf-split.pdf543.79 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.